Journals45
Newest
(Except, the anthropomorphic characters have no stand powers)
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Hello everyone and I know it seems like bringing up the flaws of TLJ seems redundant as the film came into theaters almost a year ago but I also want to bring my personal view of why killing Snoke was a mistake that sort of ruined the movie to me (When I first saw TLJ, Snoke's death didn't bothered me a bit, but as time went on after seeing it twice I soon started to see the flaw within the film itself and how any potential was gone for ST) And I bring this up thanks to Thor Skywalker. V
Now lets go back into time to December 2015-February 2016, everyone by than has seen TFA and the Star Wars community was cooking up ideas&theories of who is Supreme Leader Snoke? It got everyone curious and engaging with the story as we were excited to see how will they reveal him and explore his backstory in 8, but than RJ just had to go with subverting expectations in lazy his way of just killing him by Kylo Ren, now sure there will be people who would say but what about Emperor Palpatine in the OT? Well sure they didn't explore who is and how he became Emperor until the Prequel trilogy came, the reason why nobody complained about Palpatine's death in RotJ was because we understood what was going on with the galaxy, the sequel trilogy is suppose to explain why has the galaxy become overruled by the First Order and how come Luke's Jedi order and the new republic hasn't stop them? Really it just shows how lazy RJ is when some few Star Wars fans came up with an idea that sort of fixes some of the problems with TLJ.
And I also loved the idea of Supreme Leader Snoke being Darth Plagueis, but does that mean we should not have our expectations subverted? Well it should have been done right other wise. *Glares at Roundhead Johson's smug face*
Your guy's thoughts?
Now lets go back into time to December 2015-February 2016, everyone by than has seen TFA and the Star Wars community was cooking up ideas&theories of who is Supreme Leader Snoke? It got everyone curious and engaging with the story as we were excited to see how will they reveal him and explore his backstory in 8, but than RJ just had to go with subverting expectations in lazy his way of just killing him by Kylo Ren, now sure there will be people who would say but what about Emperor Palpatine in the OT? Well sure they didn't explore who is and how he became Emperor until the Prequel trilogy came, the reason why nobody complained about Palpatine's death in RotJ was because we understood what was going on with the galaxy, the sequel trilogy is suppose to explain why has the galaxy become overruled by the First Order and how come Luke's Jedi order and the new republic hasn't stop them? Really it just shows how lazy RJ is when some few Star Wars fans came up with an idea that sort of fixes some of the problems with TLJ.
And I also loved the idea of Supreme Leader Snoke being Darth Plagueis, but does that mean we should not have our expectations subverted? Well it should have been done right other wise. *Glares at Roundhead Johson's smug face*
Your guy's thoughts?
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Hello everyone, as some of you people (My followers and to who ever is reading this) have heard of the most recent video game controversies surrounding Battlefield 5 and how it was revealed 3 months ago [link] clearly if you don't know why there is a controversy with Battlefield 5 it's that the game is suppose to be a historic depiction of humanity's most bloodiest war from the 20th century, and the reason why is that there appears to be women who is fighting alongside with Allied soldiers fighting against the bad guys as we know as Nazis, now of course it seems like a political move of EA and Dice to show off of them being woke and feminism to show that we respect wamen! Yet this is a battlefield game that is known to portray realism within a military conflict environment and Dice are going back to making Battlefield games that are set in the past like how they did with Battlefield 1 back in 2016 (And how the battlefield franchise started) and you know about me who loves playing video games and has interest in studying history and I am not saying that I don't want women in my video games that I play, I am just bringing out the problem and contradiction of how BF5 is portraying to be this accurate WWII shooter game while being woke with third-wave feminism and how EA is again being an idiot of attacking people who criticized their latest Battlefield game.
Now if we are going to bring up history of the second world war and how Battlefield 5 clearly contradicts itself of being an accurate depiction of WWII, was there any women who played a role in the war?....Yes there is but not in the way third-wave feminists would like to think, [link] during the second world war in the allied countries like the United States and Great Britain, women would fill in the role of being factory workers of managing and producing weapons, vehicles and equipment in the war effort because most of the men enlisted or drafted into the military to liberate Europe form Nazi Germany and fighting the imperial Japanese invaders from the Pacific, women would also take the role of being nurses helping the wounded men from combat, but were there any women who also fought against the Axis? In occupied Europe, there were some women in Resistance/Partisan movements that focused on guerrilla warfare tactics on the Germans, and on the eastern front Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union needed every able body personal to fend off the invading force of the Third Reich, yes there was some women who did play a role but the problem with Battlefield 5 is how it is being executed and why so many people are speaking out against this [link] and gee does EA ever wonder why their pre-orders of BF5 are so low compared to COD Black Ops 4? [link] (I am not even excited for Black Ops 4 due to SP being scraped for Battle Royal) and as a video gamer myself, I do think the Battlefield games are fun FPS military shooters (even though I have not played any battlefield games but would love to play BF1) and how they have done great in the past, but has battlefield 5 become so woke? Well, they could have done better with the reveal trailer [link] and if they wanted to show off there being a playable women? They could have had the women been a resistance fighter or set in the eastern front of her being a female sniper,
along with a better attitude of not attacking your customers and fans that have supported your product all these years. So are you guys going to get Battlefield 5 or not?
Now if we are going to bring up history of the second world war and how Battlefield 5 clearly contradicts itself of being an accurate depiction of WWII, was there any women who played a role in the war?....Yes there is but not in the way third-wave feminists would like to think, [link] during the second world war in the allied countries like the United States and Great Britain, women would fill in the role of being factory workers of managing and producing weapons, vehicles and equipment in the war effort because most of the men enlisted or drafted into the military to liberate Europe form Nazi Germany and fighting the imperial Japanese invaders from the Pacific, women would also take the role of being nurses helping the wounded men from combat, but were there any women who also fought against the Axis? In occupied Europe, there were some women in Resistance/Partisan movements that focused on guerrilla warfare tactics on the Germans, and on the eastern front Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union needed every able body personal to fend off the invading force of the Third Reich, yes there was some women who did play a role but the problem with Battlefield 5 is how it is being executed and why so many people are speaking out against this [link] and gee does EA ever wonder why their pre-orders of BF5 are so low compared to COD Black Ops 4? [link] (I am not even excited for Black Ops 4 due to SP being scraped for Battle Royal) and as a video gamer myself, I do think the Battlefield games are fun FPS military shooters (even though I have not played any battlefield games but would love to play BF1) and how they have done great in the past, but has battlefield 5 become so woke? Well, they could have done better with the reveal trailer [link] and if they wanted to show off there being a playable women? They could have had the women been a resistance fighter or set in the eastern front of her being a female sniper,
along with a better attitude of not attacking your customers and fans that have supported your product all these years. So are you guys going to get Battlefield 5 or not?
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Featured